A while back a similar coupon for $30 off $150 that excluded tech was posted,and it got "worst deal of the day". Although the coupon is more realistic, I don't see how the negative aspect of tech exclusion makes one much better than the other.
hurray finally i got -ve from you ,actually i was waiting for that and now i got chance to explain why i posted this coupon and why got so many votes also (11 positive).
Now listen Mr.Oberon
$30 off $150 means 10 % discount and for 10 % you have to purchase for 150 while there are coupons for 20% off on furniture and $20 Off $75.....but $15 off $60 means 25% discount and that is not common and one more thing for 25% discount you don't need to purchase for $75 or $100 or $150 and there are so many furniture around $60.
I did mention the whole "more realistic" part I believe.
I choose to vote consistently, and if I vote a deal down for a very particular reason, then I believe it is only fair to do the same when a similar deal with the similar issues arises.
Also, I find their furniture is way too overpriced, thus nullifying the discount, and often very cheaply constructed. (Since you brought it up as a supporting argument)
Perhaps its my turn to make an assertion today, perhaps the user IDs "orangearrows" and "TheBest" are in fact the same person, as a great many of their votes coincide and they often use the same slang/speech while writing as well.
I can make false accusations as well, its not very difficult, if the two of you want to play it this way that fine, your welcome to make fools out of yourself in front of everyone else.
It is not my fault, and nor do I have control over how other users vote, and I would conclude that at this point the two of you are simply so insecure about your current positions in the contest, that in order to hold onto them, you would say or do anything to manipulate others into voting for you. Perhaps it may be that you think by working together that you can create a voting block to protect your positions.
I have never tried to rig a contest! However it is very clear that you two are trying to do that. Your nothing less than guilty of your own false accusations.
From her until the end of the month I will not be posting any further items, thus effectively removing myself from the contest, so as I cannot be accused of trying to rig the vote in my own favor (although I will be rigging it for others).
However, I would like to propose a new strategy for myself and any others who will join me, in order to end the block voting and manipulation of “orangearrows” and “The Best”. Every deal they post will receive a negative vote from me guaranteed, without regard for its content.
Additionally, from this point forward any deal posted by any other user than the two previously mentioned, regardless of its type, will receive a positive vote from me.
If you don’t want to vote with me based on principle or what is fair, then do it for the money, but together we can bring this cheaters/manipulators down from their positions. (And you all will make a couple out of bucks of it!)
Additionally, please do not vote on any of the items that I currently have up, as I do not want any more positive votes or deal wins for the rest of the month. I simply want to make sure that I cannot win the contest either, considering the course of action I’ve chosen to undertake and the request I’ve made.
Actually - I've asked the mods to close my account I'm done here, as apparently they are wiling to tolerate cheaters and manipulators over people who have been wronged.
Instead of addressing those who rigged yesterdays contest and attack other members personally, they have chosen to remove the votes I placed in protest. However, I still encourage all of you to stand your ground and through your actions call for fairness by the ousting the two people who have been acting in the fashion I was falsely accused of.
You don't need to vote negative, but you can always simply not vote. Don't support those who don't deserve it.
Sign in to comment